CLE resources

• The two-track structure of a Missouri DWI: criminal prosecution vs. administrative license action, and where the refusal and test-result procedures diverge.
• Deadline-recognition risk: why the administrative hearing-request window is easy to miss, and why every computed deadline is an attorney-confirmation item.
• Controlled skill demonstration: one intake run on a synthetic fact pattern, output on screen.
• The verification requirement: authority-gated output, ⛔ OPEN questions, and why "fluent" is not "verified."

• Everything in the 30-minute session, plus:
• Discovery package design: which records a breath-test case turns on and the regulation behind each request.
• Client communication: explaining two parallel cases in plain language without promising outcomes.
• Offender classification: the statutory ladder, why priors require confirmation, and classification vs. predicted disposition.
• Foundation categories: stop, arrest, implied consent, observation, permits, calibration.

• Everything above, plus:
• A synthetic arrest packet (clearly labeled synthetic) worked end-to-end.
• Manual checklist pass: attendees spot foundation issues themselves before any tool runs.
• Authority verification exercise: trace one skill assertion back to the primary source.
• Generic-prompt comparison: the same packet through an uncontrolled prompt, differences discussed.
• Red-team exercise: attendees try to make the skill assert something unverified.

Participants should be able to:

• Distinguish the criminal and administrative tracks of a Missouri DWI.
• Identify when refusal and test-result procedures diverge.
• Explain why deadline computations require source confirmation.
• Use AI for organization and drafting without delegating legal judgment.
• Identify common breath-test foundation categories.
• Verify statutory and regulatory authority against primary sources.